Licenced from Shutterstock
Introduction   |   Theory   |   Summary   |   Application   |   Audio/Video   |   Easy & Simple   |   Appendices

A systems view of biological health

Section 2: Theory

41 : From Mammals to Hominids

Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 : also see my full Copyright statement.
HELP REQUIRED! This website/book has (for technical issues) been written using a plain ASCII text editor, and so contains quite a few typo's. If you find any and have a couple of minutes you can report them - see contact page!

Humans have a small but significant physical adaptations that distinguish them from most other mammals. However, the majority of human anatomy and physiology is distinctly mammalian

The greatest influences that influenced the evolution of a healthy human nervous system were "soft" – i.e. social

The mammalian body plan provides both thermoregulation and rapid release of energy, allowing mammals to adapt to a vast range of environments - deserts, ice packs, frozen and tropical seas, and up to two kilometers deep in the ocean. Mammals run as fast as 70 miles per hour, fly, burrow, eat insects, plankton, meat, vegetation, are the largest creature in the seas (the blue whale reaching up to 30 metres long and 200 tons) and on land (elephants weigh about 6 tons) or can be as little as two inches long and (humans) may live over 100 years. Human physiology along with the arrangement of the ANS is broadly (allowing for that vast range of mammal behaviour and habitat ) equivalent to the physiology of most other mammals, with a few special adaptations.

Humans (Homo Sapiens, or "thinking man") started out about three million years ago as Australopithecus, which then developed into Homo Erectus ("upright man") - who were already mass-producing obsidian hand axes at 1.2 million years BP and probably had already some mastery of codage and knots. So far as we currently understand, Homo Sapiens is the result of interbreeding of several descendents of Homo Erectus, including Neanderthals and Denisovans [13] during at least two waves of migration out of Africa and many phases of East-West population migration across Asia, plus at least two major migrations through Alaska into the Americas [12]. So although it is possible to generalise, all humans are not exactly the same, having varying ancestries and inherited adaptations. More Denisovan ancestry can give better adaptation to high altitude. More Neanderthal ancestry can result in a more square hip joint, less limb flexibility but greater body strength, and a more sensitive, more easily overloaded nervous system [8]. There are further subdivisions of human metabolic range according to regional variations in gut microbiome – this and blood group types having been affected by many generations of ecosystem, dietary, climate and terrain-specific adaptations. [9].

But the vast majority of humans evolved as hunter-gatherers in small extended families, moving with the seasons, following food and water, just another migratory animal. As humans we have a few very specific adaptations. Pursuit hunting is a very arduous activity that requires we thermoregulate and move in a more energy-efficient way than our prey. Ungulates (hooved animals) are capable of sprinting much more rapidly than humans - but cannot so easily thermoregulate, and their rate of breathing and gait when running (and therefore energy usage) is rigidly linked together, one breath equating to one stride. So we have adapted to thermoregulate by sweating – something quite rare amongst mammals. Our upright gait provides an extremely energy-efficient [1] easy jogging pace in which gait and breath are de-coupled by upright biomechanics and a muscular diaphragm.

The human body is the least adapted of all animals (being very similar to the newborns of the great apes), having no hooves, claws, canines or heavy fur to speak of. This lack of hard adaptation allows us to adapt it by usingit differently – treating the whole body as if it is a tool - including the addition of actual tools as limb extensions, and clothing. We must have tamed fire a long time ago. Cooking (including fermentation) allows food to be softer; and it is only with the reduced mechanical effort to eat soft food that the temporalismuscle can shrink, the bones of the skull become less thick and dense, and the cranium expand to accommodate a larger brain. With softer food came less adapted teeth which also change the jaw angle and allow a finer balance of the weight of the head – making running more efficient. Our hands are a marvel of adaptability, allowing strong but also precise movement. But the adaptation is still general rather than specific. We have adapted to be as adaptable as possible.

LeftQ  When despair grows in me
and I wake in the middle of the night at the least sound
in fear of what my life and my children's lives may be,
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things
who do not tax their lives with forethought
of grief. I come into the presence of still water.
And I feel above me the day-blind stars
waiting for their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.  RightQ

Wendell Berry

At some point our ape ancestors started to sing [2] as a form of communication. The songs then developed common meaning and eventually turned into speech as we evolved both a voicebox and additional neural capacity to devise and vocalise and make sense of a broad vocabulary. We also managed to re-invent colour vision, most mammals seeing in black and white. Who knos what senses hang around in the subconscious – things we could hear, and see but cannot because we do not yet know we can. The lack of use of words for certain colours in ancient languages suggest that whilst we may have been able to "detect" blues for maybe hundreds of thousands of years, this subliminal recognition only became conscious (such that we could name what our senses could discriminate) relatively recently in human history. (See extended discussion in endnote [3] .) Laurens van der Post in his book Heart of the Hunter (1961) reported that the Bushmen were sad for him that he could not hear the stars singing, and thought initially that he was telling them a bad joke:

LeftQ  So the traffic of meaning between the Bushman and the stars has gone on from the beginning right into the lives of his descendants in the desert of today, like that traffic of angels which Jacob saw in a dream during his own desert flight, ascending and descending a ladder pitched between him and the sky. Nor was the traffic visual only. I have already mentioned the sounds wherein the stars speak to the Kalahari Bushman today: nearly a hundred years ago a Bushman told Bleek about their voices; and he said too – a thing I had not heard in the Kalahari – that the sun had a great voice of its own. It made a ringing sound in the sky. When I read that, I thought instantly of the great chord [4] with which Goethe begins the music of Faust : "Die Sonne – tönt nach alter Weise."

And of course there is the "sapiens" part of being human. Some might say/have said the human mind, the ability to think, create, abstract, invent, employ language and tell stories is our great gift. Others might call it the "monkey mind" – something that takes over and causes trouble for no good reason other than the fun of it. I think this latter phrase is disrespectful to monkeys.

So far the specifics mentioned that might apply to how a human body-mind is supposed to be used any different from most [10] other mammal (such as a horse or dog) - include

LeftQ  Today the only things you can enter into relationship with are other humans. Yet the human nervous system still needs the nourishment that it once got from being in reciprocity with all these other shapes of sensitivity and sentience. And so we turn toward each other, toward our human friends and our lovers, in hopes of meeting that need. We turn toward our human partners demanding a depth and range of otherness that they cannot possibly provide. Another human cannot possibly provide all of the outrageously diverse and vital nourishment that we once got from being in relationship with dragonflies and swallowtails and stones and lichen and turtles. It’s just not possible. We used to carry on personal relationships with the sun and the moon and the stars! To try and get all that, now, from another person — from another nervous system shaped so much like our own — continually blows apart our relationships, it explodes so many of our marriages, because they can’t withstand that pressure.  RightQ

David Abram[5]

On top of this we have the vast relational-adaptive behavioural and symbiotic range. The three million years since Australopithecus and probably all of the ten million years before then saw us largely moving round in extended families – people of all ages from babies to the moderately old, in groupings of up to about 20 or 30 people[6]. The land was not farmed so much as tended – creating vast areas of ecosystem (e.g. the Amazon rainforest, the Pacific Northwest) that were essentially self-sustaining larders. If you live in such a group, then children are parented by the whole community and mutual trust - cemented by a social structure and ceremony based on an intimate perpetually renewed relationship with the living landscape - is the glue that binds everything together[7].

LeftQ  Teach the children. We don't matter so much, but the children do. Show them daisies and the pale hepatica. Teach them the taste of sassafras and wintergreen. The lives of the blue sailors, mallow, sunbursts, the moccasin flowers. And the frisky ones – inkberry, lambs-quarters, blueberries. And the aromatic ones – rosemary, oregano. Give them peppermint to put in their pockets as they go to school. Give them the fields and the woods and the possibility of the world salvaged from the lords of profit. Stand them in the stream, head them upstream, rejoice as they learn to love this green space they live in, its sticks and leaves and then the silent, beautiful blossoms.  RightQ

Mary Oliver

All this co-creative relationality that is so "human" also started tens or hundreds of millions of years before hominids graced the planet. Humans (and all of Live) being self-reflective, there is an internal relationality between attention and body that is directly equivalent to external relationality – that can at best be equal and supportive.

References & Notes

1 Christopher McDougall (Jun 20, 2018) Secrets of the Tarahumara: They run like no other people in the world, but their ways are worth imitating. If you can find them. https://www.runnersworld.com/runners-stories/a20954821/born-to-run-secrets-of-the-tarahumara/
2 Jon Hamilton (August 16, 2010) Signing, Singing, Speaking: How Language Evolved. https://www.npr.org/2010/08/16/129155123/signing-singing-speaking-how-language-evolved
Celtic colors, c Cedrusk
3 It is only in naming that there is full clarity of recognition – a theme well recognised in the world of emotions and interoception. Animals predating mammals (such as dinosaurs an dmodern birds) were tetrochromats (four different cone receptors for colour). Early mammals were nocturnal rat-like creatures and eventually decided that the genetic load of two of those cones was too much, so most mammals are bichromats (2 cones) don’t see why external senses should be governed by rules different form those that apply to internal senses.
The 19th century British prime minister Gladstone was not only a politician, but also an avid greek scolar. His analysis of the works of Homer sparked enormous academic debate around the capacity of humans to see (detect) and accurately classify/describe colour. His section on how Homer wrote about and included concepts of colour is worth reading in its original version, Volume 3 / IV AODIOS / Sect IV Homer’s Perceptions and Use of Colour. The Ancient Greeks (and has been discovered since, people in every single civilisation in the world of the same historic period) could only distinguish between various shades of ochre, from black through yellows, reds and brows to white, along with various textual variations such as the sheen of bronzes, sparkliness, reflectiveness etc. It was only later that greens, blues and true blue-ish (as opposed to reddish) violets appear in literature. His findings have since been extended out to include ALL civilisations throughout the world. Celtic languages retain something of this - with the word glas referring to a very broad spectrum of green, blue, grey, and shimmering brightness. It was heavily tied to the natural landscape—describing fresh grass, foliage, the shimmering or translucent sea, the sky, and pale animal coats or eyes (such as grey-green or blue-green eyes). Beyond color itself, glas carried connotations of freshness, youth, translucency, or a wet/gleaming surface (like the shimmer of a fish or frost on a stone) - for the full range it is worth seeing the original paper Sabine Asmus & Mark Ó Fionná in (2024) The Early Concept of the Celtic Colour-Term glas in Welsh and Irish and itsLater Semantic Diversification. Journal of Celtic Linguistics, 25, 1–35 doi:10.16922/jcl.25.2.
Suggesting that if we go back 2 or 3 thousand years qualitative impression had precedent in human perception over colour/wavelength. This is an interesting and more spacious way of seeing.
Over time, Welsh Celtic tended to use it for blue, whereas Irish Celtic tended more towards green. Welsh also retains a metaphorical relationship between green and youth - whereas in English it refers to someone naiive and inept. It may be that the English usage perverted that Celtic qualitative reference for political reasons - somewhat like the modern perversion/inversion of the term "woke".
My personal interpretation of this is that - even though we may have recovered some colour vision in our retinas - allowing for unconscious discrimination of colour - the idea of these colours to allow cognitive discrimination had not yet reached our cousciousness, partly because we were more interested in some kind of numinous quality that underlay the wavelength/colour. And that historic shift in colour perception was a global shift in consciousness. Leading to interesting questions as to what we might now be sensing - but not (yet) aware that we are sensing? Image from Cedrusk / Facebook
4 Die Sonne – tönt nach alter Weise translates roughly as "The Sun – sings its ancient [story through its] song".
5  https://wildethics.org/essay/david-abram-interviewed-by-derrick-jensen/
6 Dunbar’s optimum group number of 150 individuals only really applies to settlements. Once there is a need or desire for mobility then – unless the drive for security requires great numbers, smaller groups averaging 15 people are more favoured. Robin I.M. Dunbar, Richard Sosis (2018) Optimising human community sizes. Evolution and Human Behavior. 39(1) Pages 106-111. ISSN 1090-5138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.11.001
7 Darcia Narvaez & G. A. Bradshaw (2023) The Evolved Nest: Nature's Way of Raising Children and Creating Connected Communities. North Atlantic Books ISBN-13: 978-1623177676 and https://evolvednest.org/
8)  Research at Loyola University showed autism is associated with markers from neanderthal ancestry.
9)  https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/human-evolution/they-could-spend-4-or-5-hours-per-day-underwater-how-humans-adapted-to-the-most-challenging-environments. - a review of the 2026 book by Hernan Pontzer - Adaptable: How Your Unique Body Really Works and Why Our Biology Unites Us (Penguin Random House)
10)  I think we are over-caught up in the uniqueness of human-ness, and it is also hard to find any facet of human-ness that may not be shared by some other creatures. For instance, cetaceans also have fully de-coupled breathing, AND have fully conscious breathing. The anatomical hands, the capacity for adaptive learned behaviour (via the complexity of the brain) and the ability to abstract/represent and asume cognitive meta-positions (such as multi-layered tokens of economic value, or abstract art, or tools-that-make-tools) are probably the most definitively human feature of humans.
11)  A topic that could easily take up whole books - the way that we create hard-wired gestalts before birth and during the first 18 months of infancy, that may be seen in detailed individual variations in neural connectivity (fiber density and “circuitry”) of both motor and autonomic fibers - layered with “software” Gestalts. It also appears that most (if not all) gestalts have specific autonomic activity ranges for which they are relevant.
12)  See the latest (2026) version of the human ancestral line here https://x.com/Tatsuya9JP/status/2111861730120716329
13)  Homo family tree from The Real Zeke Darwin https://linktr.ee/zekedarwin : Note: there have been several bottlenecks and near-extinctions inferred from both DNA and the palaeoclimatic record - notable events being c 2 million years BP, c900k-800k years BP in which human population dropped to just over 1200 individuals, the Toba super-eruption c74k years BP, and the Neolithic (c 7000 BP) Y-chromosome bottleneck (resulting from steppe tribes raiding Europe, N Africa and Asia).
Human evolutionary timeline, c The Real Zeke Darwin

 
Licenced from Shutterstock